Name of Observer: Robin Porter
Observed Meeting: South Whidbey School Board Date of Meeting: Feb. 18, 2024 Members present: Directors Andrea Downs, Joseph Greenheron, Marnie Jackson, Ann Johnson, Brook Willeford, Superintendent Josephine P. Moccia, Student Members Katya Schiavone and Carter McKnight, Principals John Patton, Kayla Phillips, and Susie Richards, Assistant Superintendent Dan Poolman, and Communications Director Kristina Macarro. Members absent: None Others present (staff, media, public): Representatives from two companies (OAC and Parametrix) publicly bidding on accomplishing bond process for SWSD. Summarize the main issues discussed at the meeting: SWSD chose Parametrix (https://www.parametrix.com/) as the Owner Representative to manage the bond process for the district. Tom Rooks, AIA, LEED AP, will be the lead Project/Construction Manager. Board members heard presentations made by both companies during an Executive Session held just prior to their public vote. Due to frozen pipes and inclement weather, the last day of school may move past the planned date of June 14, into the next week. Superintendent Moccia said that to make up for three days of school closure, students will be attending school on the Friday prior to Memorial Day weekend (May 24) and may be required to add a few days onto the end of the school year, depending upon whether the state Office of Public Instruction grants a waiver to the district, based on its policy of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ affecting the required 180 days of school. During the SWSD Financial and Enrollment report, Assistant Superintendent Poolman outlined concerns about a predicted drop in state funding based on declining district enrollment and “broken funding models” being considered by the legislature. Two Bills proposed by the state legislature could contribute to this drop- HB 2494 (addressing ‘materials, supplies and operating costs, or MSOC) and HB2180 (addressing special education funding). Specifically, neither the funds covering MSOC,’ nor those for special ed would keep up with the district’s needs, according to Poolman. For example, he said the 2% state increase for the MSOC funding does not consider the actual purchase costs, nor the cost of utilities and insurance. Poolman said that even though the district’s student population is gradually declining, the 15,000 sq ft of building space still requires the same utility use (heating/cooling). Regarding special education, he said the district is at the cap of 15% of its population in this segment, and that the state formula is unfortunately not based on increasing the funding amount per student. If the district should exceed the 15% population mark, then the funding would need to be divided equally among these special ed students, reducing the amount available for each student. Fund Balances Summary Fund 1/31/24 General Fund $ 4,780,449.51 Capital Projects Fund $2,670,905.64 Debt Service Fund $ 86,677.32 Associated Student Body Fund $ 108,141.67 Transportation Fund $682,231.96 Private Purpose Trust Fund $ 809,919.33 Enrollment Summary FTE Budget for 23-24 Feb 2024 Sept 2023 YTD Avg Enrollment 1,106.00 1,122.79 1,122.29 1,120.25 List any issues on the agenda relevant to any LWV state or local positions or programs: (League positions can be found here: Positions - LWV Whidbey Island) Do you recommend local League action or study on any of these issues? Yes If ‘yes’ what action do you recommend? I recommend the LWV study both HB 2494 and HB 2180, to determine their potential impact on SWSD. Was the meeting conducted in an open, business-like, and civil manner? Yes Was the agenda made available prior to and at the meeting? Yes Did members adhere to the provided agenda? Yes Were any non-agenda items discussed? No Was there adequate discussion of issues? Yes Were any “Executive Sessions” called? Yes (on publicly bid contract/ bidder presentations) Was there adequate opportunity for public input? Yes Was background material available to the public? Yes Did any member recuse themselves during the meeting? No
0 Comments
Name of Observer: Becky Bolte
Observed Meeting: Oak Harbor School Board Date of Meeting: 10/30/2023 Members present: Lynn Goebel, Bob Hallahan, Nicole Tesch, Sharon Jensen, Josiah Villano, Student Board Member, Maggie Litvachuk, Student Board Member Members absent: Others present (staff, media, public): Superintendent Michelle Kuss-Cybula, Asst Superintendent Dwight Lundstrom Summarize the main issues discussed at the meeting: 3.01 Construction update Presentation by CSG (Construction Services Group). They are non-profit and part of Educational Services District 112. Represented by Heidi Hansen, Assoc. Director, and Tex Ladish and Ken Kuiken, Construction Managers. They will be doing project management, construction management, financial tracking, grant coordination, furniture. Projects are Crescent Harbor Elementary & Hand-in-Hand. Work includes ongoing design, property survey, geotechnical exploration, traffic impact analysis, inventory of items to be reused, coordination with city and county. Both properties are on Navy land. Funded through grants – 80% federal, 20% state, no local funding. Both projects are over budget at Schematic Design Phase, and the Design team has already reduced costs and formal value engineering is in progress. Begin construction: CHE and HiH – June 2024 CHE Move-in - December 2025 HiH Move-in – March 2026 4.01 Student representative Report & Goals 1. Sustainability – lead a workgroup to identify sustainability goals 2. Land acknowledgement – research Native tribes that inhabited Oak Harbor, write a statement for Oak Harbor schools 3. Communication – weekly reports 4.02 Visitors. Cary Wade – had to resign as Paraeducator because she didn’t make enough money. Asked Board to get creative and look for more ways to fund paraeducators’ wages. 5.01 Superintendent’s report - Reviewed template for Board members to track Superintendent’s goal. 7.01 Athletics and activities report - Presented by Athletic Director Fleury, 46% of the student body is involved in athletics. There are 650 single sport athletes. 9.01 Board policy updates first reading - Asst. Superintendent Lundstrom listed and reviewed several policies – essential, encouraged, discretionary, etc. 12.01 Board goal updates are posted on the school district website. 13.01 Upcoming meetings –regular board meetings -Nov 13 and 27 at 6 pm, Board study session for new board members – Dec. 11, Legislative forum December 15 at 3 p.m. List any issues on the agenda relevant to any LWV state or local positions or programs: (League positions can be found here. Do you recommend local League action or study on any of these issues? N/A If ‘yes’ what action do you recommend? Was the meeting conducted in an open, business-like, and civil manner? Yes Consider the following questions and respond if relevant: Was the agenda made available prior to and at the meeting? Yes Did members adhere to the provided agenda? Yes Were any non-agenda items discussed? No Was there adequate discussion of issues? Yes Were any “Executive Sessions” called? No Was there adequate opportunity for public input? Yes Was background material available to the public? Yes- agenda and previous meeting minutes Did any member recuse themselves during the meeting? No If yes, for what reason? List any other concerns or observations: Observer E-mail: bbolte@comcast.net Date submitted: 10/31/23 Name of Observer: Jane Ficalora
Observed Meeting: Langley City Council Date of Meeting: 10/16/2023 Members present: Harolynne Bobis, Rhonda Salerno, Thomas Gill, Craig Cyr, Gail Fleming Members absent: none Others present (staff, media, public): Mayor: Scott Chaplin, Interim Archives and Records Manager: Kristen Abraham, City Administrator/Clerk: Mark Rentfrow, Director of Public Works: Randi Perry, Chief of Police: Tavier Wasser and Finance Director: Wanda Grone Members of public in person and on zoom are not shown unless they make a comment. Summarize the main issues discussed at the meeting: • At public comment period a business owner and a longtime resident voiced concerns about changes the projected affordable housing development would have to the fairgrounds. They expressed a love of the fair as it has been for many years and not wanting to see future development cause any disruptive changes. • The mayor's report included news of the city receiving six proposals for solar plus storage. Mayor Chaplin mentioned that decentralization of power has been an idea developing for about 30 years and microgrids are starting to be used in reservations and other cities. The mayor also reported he had received a request from a national organization to sign a pledge to reject new or renewed expansion of fossil fueled infrastructure. Chaplin did not think the wording of the pledge was suitable to the city of Langley. He suggested sending the pledge to the Climate Crisis Action Commission for the creation of a similar pledge specific to Langley. • Public Works Director Randi Perry's report included that Langley has been selected to participate in EPA's Creating Resilient Water Utilities Initiative. The program includes free technical assistance and is scheduled to begin mid 2024. The director was happy to report progress on the Bluff management plans with a kickoff meeting on 10/4 and completion of onsite visits and drone flights on 10/11. Also noted was the Langley Infrastructure Project's planning and funding options. Council members voiced desire to be included in the work of Public Works Advisory and Finance and Personnel Legislative Commission's progress on this very extensive project. List any issues on the agenda relevant to any LWV state or local positions or programs: (League positions can be found here. Fair & Adequate Revenue Energy Shorelines, Wetlands & Land Use Water & Rivers Do you recommend local League action or study on any of these issues? No If ‘yes’ what action do you recommend? Was the meeting conducted in an open, business-like, and civil manner? All in attendance were given time to speak and ask questions. The meeting was conducted in an orderly and civil manner. Consider the following questions and respond if relevant: Was the agenda made available prior to and at the meeting? Yes Did members adhere to the provided agenda? Yes Were any non-agenda items discussed? No Was there adequate discussion of issues? Yes Were any “Executive Sessions” called? No Was there adequate opportunity for public input? Yes Was background material available to the public? Yes Did any member recuse themselves during the meeting? No If yes, for what reason? List any other concerns or observations: Observer E-mail: jrfic@yahoo.com Date submitted: 10/21/2023 Name of Observer: Jane Ficalora
Observed Meeting: Langley City Council Date of Meeting: 10/2/2023 Members present: Harolynne Bobis, Rhonda Salerno, Thomas Gill, Craig Cyr, Gail Fleming Members absent: none Others present (staff, media, public): Mayor: Scott Chaplin, Interim Archives and Records Manager: Kristen Abraham, City Administrator/Clerk: Mark Rentfrow, Planning Director: Meredith Penny, Director of Public Works: Randi Perry, Chief of Police: Tavier Wasser, Planning Advisory Board Chair Greg Easton and Planning Advisory Board former member Rose Hughes Members of public in person and on zoom are not shown unless they make a comment. Summarize the main issues discussed at the meeting: • At public comment period a representative of the Chamber of Commerce stated that the chamber will be having a candidate forum Oct 11th at 5:30 at The Braeburn Restaurant • Planning Advisory Board Chair Greg Easton and Rose Hughes reported and made recommendations on inclusionary zoning requirement in the city's Multifamily Infill Overlay. Since receiving a 2021 grant Langley has been looking at whether or not to make inclusionary zoning mandatory or voluntary. The factors of private versus non-profit developers and the needs, long-term goals, and growth potential of Langley all factor into the decision making. Council member Salerno made a motion to restart a Housing Affordability committee to look at getting non-profits to help with development. Council member Cyr made amendment to start a committee after the new year and the motion passed. • Planning Director Penny asked for approval of amended contract with The Watershed Company. Council voted unanimously to approve. • Administrator/Clerk Rentfrow reported that the Washington State Attorney General has posted open government training online. Council member Gill mentioned by law that newly elected officials need to take training within a certain number of days in office. List any issues on the agenda relevant to any LWV state or local positions or programs: (League positions can be found here. Democracy: Elections, Voting Rights & Campaign Finance Fair & Adequate Revenue Water &Rivers Do you recommend local League action or study on any of these issues? No If ‘yes’ what action do you recommend? Was the meeting conducted in an open, business-like, and civil manner? All in attendance were given time to speak and ask questions. The meeting was conducted in an orderly and civil manner. Consider the following questions and respond if relevant: Was the agenda made available prior to and at the meeting? Yes Did members adhere to the provided agenda? Yes Were any non-agenda items discussed? No Was there adequate discussion of issues? Yes Were any “Executive Sessions” called? No Was there adequate opportunity for public input? Yes Was background material available to the public? Yes Did any member recuse themselves during the meeting? No If yes, for what reason? List any other concerns or observations: Observer E-mail: jrfic@yahoo.com Date submitted: 10/6/2023 Name of Observer: Robin Porter
Observed Meeting: South Whidbey School Board Date of Meeting: Sept. 27, 2023 Members present: Directors Andrea Downs, Joe Greenheron, Marnie Jackson, Ann Johnson, Brook Willeford, Superintendent Jo Moccia, Student Members Katya Schiavone and Carter McKnight, Principals John Patton, Kayla Phillips, and Susie Richards, Assistant Superintendent Dan Poolman, and Communications Director Kristina Macarro. Members absent: None Others present (staff, media, public): Rose Hughes, Goosefoot Finance Director (Islandrootshousing.org) Summarize the main issues discussed at the meeting: Rose Hughs of the nonprofit organization – Goosefoot – made a presentation to the board regarding the Island Roots Housing project in Langley. This project is planned to construct 14 affordable housing units in Langley. School board members stated that affordable housing is a “major concern” for school staff, as SWSD has lost teachers due to the lack of affordable housing within the South Whidbey community. SWSD is one of the top three employers in the South Whidbey community. Currently, the project is in the “preconstruction phase,” Hughs said. The project is being financed by the WA State Housing Trust Fund and a grant from Island County. Estimated rent/cost of a two-bedroom unit will be $1,504. This is based on a HUD formula that estimates 80% of the Island County median income. A community workshop was held in August in which 73 participated. Public survey results may be viewed at islandrootshousing.org English: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/GoosefootHousing Spanish: https://es.surveymonkey.com/r/GoosefootHousingESP A collective bargaining agreement was reached between SWSB and the two unions which represent school staff: SEIU and PSE. Both memorandums passed, though one board member abstained as he stated he had not yet seen the final contract. The new contract included “a wage increase of .3% and a retention bonus for one year only,” according to SWSD Superintendent Jo Moccia. SWSB Assistant Superintendent Dan Poolman presented the monthly finance report: Fund Balances Summary Fund 8/31/23 General Fund $ 5,100,001.34 Capital Projects Fund $1,978,709.90 Debt Service Fund $ 1491.76 Associated Student Body Fund $ 81,150.43 Transportation Fund $679,034.32 Private Purpose Trust Fund $ 806,239.33 Enrollment Summary FTE Budget for 23-24 Sept 2023 Sept 2023 YTD Avg Enrollment 1,106.00 1,106.29 1,106.29 1,106.29 He reports that the property taxes are “basically flat,” and that the state funding is based on FTE. An unexpected expense, Poolman said, was the repair of a septic system. The charging station to be used by the SWSD’s electric bus has arrived. The District expects to soon receive the new bus. A 10-year facilities study, required by WA state, was authorized by the board. The contract is with the Integrus company for $87,720 to cover the whole 10-year span. Integrus is the architectural firm that has done recent preliminary work for SWSD. A new “Transition to Kindergarten” program began this school year with 16 students. This is a program which prepares students for Kindergarten entry in the upcoming school year. Students must meet specific criteria to qualify for the program. Currently it has reached full capacity. List any issues on the agenda relevant to any LWV state or local positions or programs: (League positions can be found here. Do you recommend local League action or study on any of these issues? No If ‘yes’ what action do you recommend? NA Was the meeting conducted in an open, business-like, and civil manner? Yes Consider the following questions and respond if relevant: Was the agenda made available prior to and at the meeting? Yes Did members adhere to the provided agenda? Yes Were any non-agenda items discussed? No Was there adequate discussion of issues? Yes Were any “Executive Sessions” called? No Was there adequate opportunity for public input? No, members of the public requested time to address the School Board at the meeting. Was background material available to the public? Yes Did any member recuse themselves during the meeting? No If yes, for what reason? NA List any other concerns or observations: NA Observer E-mail: rbnporter81@gmail.com Date submitted: Sept. 29, 2023 Name of Observer: Judy Hucka
Observed Meeting: WhidbeyHealth Board of Commissioners Date of Meeting: September 21, 2023 Members present: Members present: All five commissioners were present: President Ron Wallin, Gregory Richardson, James Golder, Morgan Cooper, Eric Anderson. Commissioner Anderson attended remotely via Zoom Members absent: 0 Others present (staff, media, public): Staff members present: CEO Nathan Staggs, chief of staff, Dr David Lemme (attending remotely), John Freeman (Associate Vice President of HealthTech Management Services), Shanna Harney-Bates (Quality), Paul Rogers (Finance), needs updating from recording. Summarize the main issues discussed at the meeting: I was unable to attend the first half-hour of the meeting. Recordings of meetings are generally not available until 30 days after the meeting. I will update this report when I can view the recording. The meeting was primarily devoted to routine reports. There was good news from a “patient experience survey” with a score of 1.04. Anything above 1.0 is considered “better than average.” There was discussion of a new walk-in clinic in Coupeville that is in the works. The commissioners regularly say WhidbeyHealth needs to do more to promote its growing services and improving financial and management situation to the public. A new marketing manager is now on staff. Her first task is upgrading the district’s website. Financial news was mixed, with some good news and some cases of not meeting budget projections. However, the consensus is that the financial situation is consistently improving. In the recent past, the district had to pay back Medicare overpayments. However, the situation has changed and now Medicare has underpaid the district and owes the district money. The district continues to make progress in hiring medical staff, reducing the need to hire expensive traveling and temporary staff. List any issues on the agenda relevant to any LWV state or local positions or programs: (League positions can be found here. None Do you recommend local League action or study on any of these issues? No If ‘yes’ what action do you recommend? Was the meeting conducted in an open, business-like, and civil manner? Yes Consider the following questions and respond if relevant: Was the agenda made available prior to and at the meeting? Yes Did members adhere to the provided agenda? Yes Were any non-agenda items discussed? No Was there adequate discussion of issues? Yes Were any “Executive Sessions” called? Yes Was there adequate opportunity for public input? Yes Was background material available to the public? Yes, I assume so. Did any member recuse themselves during the meeting? No If yes, for what reason? List any other concerns or observations: None Observer E-mail: judy.hucka@gmail.com Date submitted: 9/26/2023 Name of Observer: Jane Ficalora
Observed Meeting: Langley City Council Date of Meeting: 9/18/2023 Members present: Harolynne Bobis, Rhonda Salerno, Thomas Gill, Craig Cyr, Gail Fleming Members absent: none Others present (staff, media, public): Mayor: Scott Chaplin, Interim Archives and Records Manager: Kristen Abraham, City Administrator: Mark Rentfrow, and Finance Director: Wanda Grone, Planning Director: Meredith Penny, Director or Public Works: Randi Perry, Chief of Police: Tavier Wasser, Chamber of Commerce Executive Director: Inge Morascini and Finance and Personnel Commissioner Rose Hughes Members of public in person and on zoom are not shown unless they make a comment. Summarize the main issues discussed at the meeting: • Mayor Chaplin reported that the Requests for Proposals on solar plus storage have gone out. Also, he met with other agencies that received this grant and there is a possibility of cooperating with educational outreach and buying solar panels in bulk instead of one agency at a time. • Directors Perry and Penny recommended approval of a contract with Cross Reiter, INC to develop a management plan for the city’s publicly owned bluffs. Council member Salerno requested that in the future, council conduct interviews if there are two applicants with competitive quotes. Approval of contract was passed unanimously. • Administrator Rent and Directors Perry and Penny informed council of an offer for a competitive low interest loan to help fund Langley infrastructure project currently at 90% in the design phase. The updated cost estimates revealed a budget shortfall of approximately $3.5 million dollars. The Public Works Advisory Commission had submitted the application in July and was one of 61 applicants to meet criteria for loan. The application included primarily funding drinking water projects and wetland restoration. Councilmembers had many questions on details of loan structure and how it would be paid back. Renfrow mentioned there still is a chance to use a grant if one is found in future and the ability to deobligate the loan at a later date. • Inge Morascini of the Chamber of Commerce talked about the future prospect of electronic charging stations being placed on HWY 525. The charging stations can be an attraction for tourism traffic. Morascini also spoke about the latest delays of Clinton Mukilteo ferry. She suggested bringing Department of Transportation personnel to council to hear directly about the hiring, training, and boat maintenance issues that have contributed to the delays. List any issues on the agenda relevant to any LWV state or local positions or programs: League positions can be found here. Fair & Adequate Revenue Energy Shorelines, Wetlands & Land Use Water & Rivers Do you recommend local League action or study on any of these issues? No If ‘yes’ what action do you recommend? Was the meeting conducted in an open, business-like, and civil manner? All in attendance were given time to speak and ask questions. There were some interruptions and confusion on rules of order, but the meeting was conducted in a civil manner. Consider the following questions and respond if relevant: Was the agenda made available prior to and at the meeting? Yes Did members adhere to the provided agenda? Members adhered to amended agenda. Allotted time for some of the items went over. Were any non-agenda items discussed? No Was there adequate discussion of issues? Yes Were any “Executive Sessions” called? No Was there adequate opportunity for public input? Yes Was background material available to the public? Yes Did any member recuse themselves during the meeting? No If yes, for what reason? List any other concerns or observations: Observer E-mail: jrfic@yahoo.com Date submitted: 9/21/2023 Name of Observer: Jane Ficalora
Observed Meeting: Langley City Council Date of Meeting: 9/5/2023 Members present: Harolynne Bobis, Rhonda Salerno, Thomas Gill, Craig Cyr, Gail Fleming Members absent: none Others present (staff, media, public): Mayor: Scott Chaplin, Interim Archives and Records Manager: Kristen Abraham, City Administrator: Mark Rentfrow, and Finance Director: Wanda Grone Members of public in person and on zoom are not shown unless they make a comment. Summarize the main issues discussed at the meeting: • Councilmember Gill presented proposed rules for good council and commission operation that he and council member Bobis had worked on together. Each councilmember contributed thoughts on if the rules would be helpful to better government management. Some members brought up that the same work is being addressed by current updating of the Commission Handbook and the work of the taskforce for uniform planning. Gill asked for members to send him input on the proposed rules for more discussion. He stated concern that the citizens are not being represented well with the current systems. • Mayor Chaplin reported that a local resident had sent a letter of complaints to the state auditor. Results from the state auditor showed that the concerns either had or were being addressed by the commission. The auditor's reply stated no laws were broken but did make some recommendations for future procedures. List any issues on the agenda relevant to any LWV state or local positions or programs: (League positions can be found here. Democracy: Elections, Voting Rights & Campaign Finance Do you recommend local League action or study on any of these issues? No If ‘yes’ what action do you recommend? Was the meeting conducted in an open, business-like, and civil manner? Yes – All inattendance were polite and the motions were discussed and voted on in an orderly manner. Consider the following questions and respond if relevant: Was the agenda made available prior to and at the meeting? Yes Did members adhere to the provided agenda? Members adhered to the agenda. Were any non-agenda items discussed? No Was there adequate discussion of issues? Yes Were any “Executive Sessions” called? No Was there adequate opportunity for public input? Yes Was background material available to the public? Yes Did any member recuse themselves during the meeting? No If yes, for what reason? List any other concerns or observations: Observer E-mail: jrfic@yahoo.com Date submitted: 9/9/2023 Name of Observer: Robin Porter
Observed Meeting: South Whidbey School Board Date of Meeting: Aug. 30, 2023 Members present: Directors Andrea Downs, Joe Greenheron, Marnie Jackson, Ann Johnson, Brook Willeford, Superintendent Jo Moccia, Student Members Audrey Gmerek and Katya Schiavone, Principals John Patton, Kayla Phillips, Dr. Jeff Fankhauser, and Susie Richards, Assistant Superintendent Dan Poolman, and Communications Director Kristina Macarro. Members absent: None Others present (staff, media, public): This meeting was observed via zoom, and there appeared to be approximately four people in the audience. Summarize the main issues discussed at the meeting: Assistant Superintendent Dan Poolman presented the following financial report summary: Funds 07/31/2023 General Fund $ 5,234,027.96 Capital Projects Fund $2,058,503.27 Debt Service Fund $ 1,489.60 Associated Student Body Fund $ 69,776.79 Transportation Fund $151,689.15 Private Purpose Trust Fund $ 805,437.93 Poolman has stated previously that the district’s budget continues to be adversely affected by inflation, declining enrollment (since the 1990s), and loss of federal funds (pandemic aid). A final budget was due to OSPI (Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction) by this August (2023). The most recent school bond vote failed by 129 votes (it’s required that a bond vote pass by a 60% majority). School lunch prices: The board voted in favor of gradually raising the school lunch cost by 5 cents each year, rather than to raise these all at once by 25 cents. The school lunch calculations are set by OSPI at a rate of $3.62, with the federal rate being $4.33 for free and reduced lunches. SWSD Superintendent Jo Moccia and Assistant Superintendent Dan Poolman have consolidated three more roles within the district: Moccia’s responsibilities now include serving as Director of Special Education; and Poolman’s responsibilities have expanded to include Director of Maintenance and Director of Human Resources. This occurred when two positions- one, a half time position and another, a part time principal position closed. They anticipate that this will be a cost savings to SWSD of about $200,000 annually. The Mother Mentor non-profit group’s lease at South Campus was approved for the upcoming year. The organization will be leasing more space and paying the SWSD a commensurate rate. SWSD is waiting on an anticipated electric charging station and electric school bus. Arrival is expected in October 2023. The SWSD has also joined with a consortium of smaller WA school districts in applying for a second electric school bus. The route the new bus will take has not yet been determined. There was discussion that hilly routes should be avoided; that the bus’s use may be rotated between several routes so that as many students as possible may get to ride. List any issues on the agenda relevant to any LWV state or local positions or programs: (League positions can be found here. Do you recommend local League action or study on any of these issues? No If ‘yes’ what action do you recommend? NA Was the meeting conducted in an open, business-like, and civil manner? Yes Consider the following questions and respond if relevant: Was the agenda made available prior to and at the meeting? Yes Did members adhere to the provided agenda? Yes Were any non-agenda items discussed? No Was there adequate discussion of issues? Yes Were any “Executive Sessions” called? Yes, for “negotiations.” An executive session followed the Board’s business meeting, to discuss negotiations for one hour. Was there adequate opportunity for public input? Yes. Was background material available to the public? Yes. Did any member recuse themselves during the meeting? No If yes, for what reason? NA List any other concerns or observations: None Observer E-mail: rbnporter81@gmail.com Date submitted: Sept. 4, 2023 Name of Observer: Jane Ficalora
Observed Meeting: Langley City Council Date of Meeting: 8/21/2023 Members present: Harolynne Bobis, Rhonda Salerno, Thomas Gill, Craig Cyr, Gail Fleming Members absent: none Others present (staff, media, public): Mayor: Scott Chaplin, Interim Archives and Records Manager: Kristen Abraham, City Administrator: Mark Rentfrow, Chief of Police: Tavier Wasser, Executive Director Langley Chamber of Commerce Inge Morascini and members of the public. There were also members of public on zoom - they are not shown unless they make a comment. Summarize the main issues discussed at the meeting: • City Administrator Mark Rentfrow highlighted some activities he has engaged in during his first weeks as administrator. He has been meeting members of community, attending webinars on accessing grants, and enrolled in an Island County Economic Development Council seven-month leadership program. • Chief Wasser announced modernization award the police department received, touted good relationship department had all summer long with community and spoke on Langley's engagement with county on Emergency Management Multijurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Wasser also spoke on recently hosting a West African delegation that included 40 children and 4 mentors making a video on domestic abuse and assault. He gave the children a short tour of City Hall and spoke briefly on the city history and government. • Records manager Abraham, Mayor Chaplin and Council member Cyr all spoke about grants Langley received for work in archiving, solar power, and local projects. • Council observed a moment of silence at the beginning of meeting in honor of passing of the whale Tokitae. Later in the meeting council members mentioned their sadness over the passing of Tokitae. Council member Cyr mentioned there had been a remembrance ceremony in Langley for Tokitae. He continued on t0 say how Langley seems to be the city that community goes to for connection time and again to manage loss. List any issues on the agenda relevant to any LWV state or local positions or programs: (League positions can be found here. Economic & Social Justice Shorelines, Wetlands and Land Use Do you recommend local League action or study on any of these issues? No If ‘yes’ what action do you recommend? Was the meeting conducted in an open, business-like, and civil manner? Yes – All in attendance were polite and the motions were discussed and voted on in an orderly manner. Consider the following questions and respond if relevant: Was the agenda made available prior to and at the meeting? Yes Did members adhere to the provided agenda? Members adhered to agenda? Yes Were any non-agenda items discussed? No Was there adequate discussion of issues? Yes Were any “Executive Sessions” called? No Was there adequate opportunity for public input? Yes Was background material available to the public? Yes Did any member recuse themselves during the meeting? No If yes, for what reason? List any other concerns or observations: Observer E-mail: jrfic@yahoo.com Date submitted: 8/23/2023 |
Archives
March 2024
Categories
All
|